Republic TV Super exclusive: Bollywood actor Hrithik Roshan accuses Kangana Ranaut of stalking

Republic TV has accessed a copy of 29-p complaint filed by actor Hrithik Roshan along with his legal counsel, Mahesh Jethmalani, against Kangana Ranaut alleging that he was being stalked and hounded by actress. Police sources in Mumbai crime department confirm that Mahesh Jethmalani has filed a police complaint on Hrithik's behalf to Jt Commissioner of Crime Department in Mumbai Police. Sources also tell Republic that Hrithik has deposited all his phones and laptops to police. complaint alleges that it was Kangana who was constantly pursuing actor and also describes him as her ‘eternal lover.’ Hrithik claims he was ‘repulsed but out of decency igred those mails’ and accuses actress of sending ‘sexually explicit’ emails.

Following exclusive, while Kangana Ranaut's team claimed that case is closed, and re was imposter, Mumbai Police confirmed to Republic TV that case is t closed as yet. Hrithik Roshan's counsel Mahesh Jethmalani also confirmed complaint to Republic TV.

After Republic's exclusive, Kangana's sister, Rangoli Chandel in a series of tweets wrote, "This is best you can do to save your face?Revive same old stalking, sexually harassing baseless complaint? Kangana was in school when your first film came if t in industry she would have called you her uncle. Young beautiful talented rich girl like Kangana doesn't need to stalk an uncle like you, u were after her she was never after you. And still you are going after her to malign her even though you have thing to say (sic)." She added, "Evryone cn tell who is stalker here forgt about Kangana she hs movd on n stalker uncle pls focus on ur children and wife Tnx (sic)"

According to complaint, two actors were introduced to one ar in January 2009, on sets of ‘Kites’ and maintained a 'strictly professional' relationship.  On May 25, 2014, Kangana’s sister Rangoli sent out an email to Hrithik Roshan accusing actor of “having a relationship with her sister but also of hacking into Ms. Ranaut's account and forcing her to take pictures and videos of herself.”

Earlier, in a series of interviews, Kangana Ranaut continued to take digs at her exes, which includes Hrithik Roshan and Aditya Pancholi and sparked a massive controversy. While everyone put forth an opinion on matter, Hrithik continued to remain unperturbed from situation.  On September 3, 2017, Suzanne Khan Roshan uploaded an im along with Hrithik with caption, “ is allegation or sad plot that can have weight to triumph over a good soul. #poweroftruth #mafamilia #goodoverevil 😇🖤🌈🦋”

Republic TV is putting out Part 1 of complaint filed by Hrithik Roshan against Kangana Ranaut-

Date: April 8, 2017

To,

Cyber Crime Cell,

Bandra Kurla Complex Road,

Opposite ICICI Bank,

Bandra East, Mumbai - 400051

Dear Sir/Madam,

Sub: Letter to put on record facts pertaining to illicit conduct of Ms. Kangana Ranaut vis-a-vis Mr Hrithik Roshan.

We are concerned for Our Client - Mr. Hrithik Roshan residing at (-------------------address in Mumbai------------------) d 42 years, and would request you to kindly take on record facts pertaining to illicit and objectionable conduct of Ms. Kangana Ranaut (he-reinafter referred to as "Ms. Ranaut") d 29 years, residing at (--------------------address in Mumbai---------------). untoward conduct of Ms. Ranaut has caused immense dam to reputation of Our Client and in interest of justice we request you to kindly take te of facts and circumstances as set out hereinafter.

-> In January 2009, Our Client was introduced for very first time to Ms. Ranaut on sets of movie "Kites". Our Client had association whatsoever with Ms. Ranaut prior to this introduction. During production and promotion of said movie relationship between Our Client and Ms. Ranaut was strictly professional. said movie was released on 21st May 2010.

-> In January 2011, Our Client invited Ms. Ranaut to attend his birthday party out of professional courtesy. party was attended by approximately 100 people who were from film fraternity and also or friends of Our Client.

-> Sometime at end of 2011, Our Client and Ms. Ranaut signed an agreement for lead male and female roles respectively for a movie titled 'Krrish 3'. production of said movie commenced in December 2011 and on completion, movie was released on 1st vember 2013. Throughout period of production and release of said movie, viz. "Krrish 3" relationship between Our Client and Ms. Ranaut was strictly professional.

-> In January 2012, Our Client hosted a party to celebrate his elder sister's birthday; an invitation was extended to Ms. Ranaut purely out of professional courtesy and many members of film fraternity were invited to celebration.

-> In March 2013, our Client along with his family was invited by Ms. Ranaut to attend her birthday party. Our Client, along with his wife, sister, parents and several or guests from film fraternity attended said party.

-> Lastly in September 2013, a birthday celebration was held for Our Client's far Mr. Rakesh Roshan. birthday celebration was coupled with launch of a book titled "To Dad, with Love". Ms. Ranaut was among over a hundred invitees from film world and she attended said function.

In sum, during period January 2009 to September 2013, Our Client's contact with Ms. Ranaut was restricted to production of said films and celebratory occasions mentioned hereinabove.

-> reafter, Our Client had contact with Ms. Ranaut for a period of almost one and a half years, Our Client met Ms. Ranaut at well kwn producer Mr. Karan Johar's birthday party. Our client congratulated Ms. Ranaut on her success for movie "Queen", which Our Client had t seen at that time, but whose rave reviews he had heard and read about. Our Client informed her of same, and also expressed his desire to watch film as soon as possible. Ms. Ranaut displayed apparent surprise at this comment and contradicted Our Client by saying that he had already seen movie and infact praised her performance in it in an email of that very day. On this statement, it was Our Client's turn to be taken aback as he had t sent any such email eir on that date or any date prior reto and he intimated this fact to Ms. Ranaut. Ms. Ranaut on her part repeatedly asserted that such an email had been sent and on Our Client's dissent, abruptly turned and walked away from Our CLient. Our Client was bemused by exchange. However, Ms. Ranaut looked perturbed and out of sheet concern he pursued her and inquired if all was well with her. Strangely, his concern evoked response from Ms. Ranaut and Our Client let matter rest re; surmising that Ms. Ranaut had perhaps made an error of identity on issue of email.

-> very next day i.e. 25th May 2014, Our Client woke up to a series of abusive text messs (in Hindi) sent between 2 A.M. and 4 A.M. from Ms Ranaut's number on his mobile number (----Number----). Our Client was understandably horrified at tone and ter of said text messs.

At around 3:30 P.M., on same day Our Client received an email from Ms. Ranaut's sister, Rangoli on his email id - hroshan@mac.com. It is pertinent to te here that said email was addressed to an email bearing id - hroshan@email.com and was marked to our Client's id - hroshan@mac.com. In this email, t only did she (Ms. Rangoli) accuse Our Client of having a relationship with her sister but also of hacking into Ms. Ranaut's account and forcing her to take pictures and videos of herself. At same time, she referred to barr of abusive text messs sent by Ms. Ranaut and asked for forgiveness on account of her sister's childishness. She also enclosed a copy of an email that was allegedly sent by Our Client to Ms. Ranaut on 5th May 2014 (this is an email from id hrosha@email.com).

Our Client had t ticed at that time that attached email dated 5th May 2014, was t from his email id. At around 3:57 PM, he replied to Ms. Rangoli's email, and categorically stated that he had idea about what Ms. Rangoli was referring to and even requested her to come and meet him in order to sort out issue.

At around 4.07 P.M., Ms. Rangoli replied to this email and said that y were incredibly stressed as y w believed that Ms. Ranaut had been communicating with an imposter for past 6 months and also that Ms. Ranaut's account was hacked. She furr stated that a joint complaint should be filed, as Our Client's name would inevitably be dragged into matter.

-> After receiving said email from Ms. Rangoli, Our Client forwarded se emails to his manr Mr. Afsar and explained bizarre situation to him. Mr. Afsar was quick to tice that it was t Our Clients email account from which email dated 5th May 2014, had been received by Ms. Kangana Ranaut. Thus, at around 4.20 PM, Our Client sent an email to Ms. Rangoli Ranaut conveying same fact and informed her that his correct email id was hroshan@mac.com

-> Our Client n approached his IT staff member one Mr. Lamba with help of Mr. Afsar and Cyber Cell Department, proceeded to work out how best to go about issue. He was advised to t communicate via his genuine email account viz. hroahsn@mac.com, in case re was a hacker and to get in touch with Ms. Ranaut and inform her that impostor could be caught using original emails received/sent on/from her laptop. Our Client immediately sent a text mess to Ms. Ranaut and informed her about advice of Cyber Cell and furr requested her to submit her laptop and phone to Cyber Sell.

-> Our Client n received a surprising email from Ms. Rangoli Ranaut, accusing him of "emotionally and psychologically raping" Ms. Ranaut. Our Client, out of sheer concern for his colleague, had done his best in order to help situation. t only had he offered to personally meet and discuss matter, but also contacted Cyber Cell for advice. On receiving such an absurd and misconceived email, replete with false allegations, Our Client decided that it was t worth his while to deal with such an unreasonable person and decided to igre entire issue.

-> Our Client received last email from Ms. Rangoli Ranaut on 26th May 2014. In this email she stated that she had idea od situation at hand. She also stated that Ms. Kangana had refused to speak to her and would t allow Ms. Rangoli to meet her, inspite of her illness. She furr stated that Ms. Ranaut was upset with her because of emails she had addressed to Our Client and also described her sister's behaviour to be erratic- sometimes that of a 50-year-old and sometimes of a 5-year-old. Moreover she stated that even in past few years of Our Clients professional association with Ms. Ranaut, during which Ms. Ranaut seems to have harbored an obsession over Our CLient, she knew that as far as Our Client was concerned his relation with Ms. Ranaut was strictly professional. Finally, she stated that she wished to put an end to matter and on that te, Our Client decided to close entire unfortunate episode.

FOR ALL ENTERTAINMENT BUZZ, FOLLOW R.GLITZ