As Delhi govt decides to do away with recorded music at pubs, netizens see one big positive (amid a sea of negatives)

Delhi government, in a circular issued on May 16, has warned restaurants in national capital that serve alcohol to stop playing recorded music.

In response to alleged complaints about loud music from vicinity of se establishments, Delhi excise department's circular states that for restaurants operating under L-17 license, which permits liquor to be served, "only live singing/playing of instruments by professionals shall be allowed."

It claims that department has received complaints from local residents regarding nuisance created by restaurants holding L-17 license violating provisions. 

It implores se establishments to comply with its rules and reiterates that L-17 licensee is permitted only to have live singing/playing of instruments by professionals within his licensed premises. Violation of se rules shall lead to strict action as per law.

Here's circular:
 

Following circular being issued and news coming to light, netizens have all manner of opinions on decision:

Those who see positive here cite that it would have one meaningful effect - 

"Yasss More Employment 👍"

In response to question:‏ "What is point of allowing live music by professionals and t recorded music?", a person wrote - "Employment, may be"

Ors don't think it's a great idea and have expressed as much (often sarcastically or with suggestions) -

"Something is terribly wrong about Delhi!"

"Means we'll have to keep hearing same 21-year-old singing same Atif Aslam song?

"What has loudness got to do with recorded or live?"

"Actually I am overjoyed with this new ruling, I can w go enjoy a drink in peace and rant about world without losing my voice next day"

"y could just have rules for decibel levels. I find live music tends to be louder than recorded music."

"Copyright violations?"

"Guess, it should be don't only in residential area. t in areas like CP, Hauz Khaz"