Considering Husband's Miserliness as Cruelty, Delhi Court Grants Woman Divorce

New Delhi: If you think saving money by avoiding household and family expenses is a good idea, n you need to think twice. A Family Court in Delhi on Wednesday granted divorce between a couple, about 10-years of marriage, considering husband’s miserliness as cruelty. decision has come up after a woman filed a divorce case before court alleging that her husband was too miser to stay toger with.

It is normally being said that everyone should develop a habit of saving money by avoiding unnecessary expenses. However, an extreme habit of saving money can get you title of being a miser and in certain cases, your spouse may even ask you for divorce. In one such incident, surfaced from Delhi, a couple got divorced as husband allegedly was too miser.

Woman h filed for divorce from her husband in 2019

case is of Family Court of Tis Hazari, where court, while pronouncing decision in favour of wife, termed husband’s misery as cruelty.

vocate Piyush Jain, who was representing 32-year-old woman in case, said that he was fighting a divorce case for woman living in Karol Bagh area of Delhi, against her 35-year-old husband.

As per vocate, his client, who works in a private bank, h an arranged marriage with her husband in 2014, who works with Air India.

woman h claimed that just within a couple of months after marriage, she came to conclusion that her husband was a cheapskate. As per her claims, her husband used to take bus or auto to travel every time he h to go somewhere.

Not only this, he used to fight with her, if she spent money on children of her in-laws.

Woman was living separately since 2017

She somehow spent three years with her husband, but she started living separately from her husband from 2017-18 onwards. In 2019, she filed a divorce case before court.

Even though husband confessed his love for his wife, woman was not rey for anything less than a divorce from her husband.

It was also said that woman was given only old clos, while new and expensive clos were not returned to her, when she h decided to live separately.

court on Wednesday, approved divorce considering husband's stinginess as cruelty.