Published 16:49 IST, September 18th 2019

SC asks Centre: 'Why manual scavengers not provided protective gear?'

SC expressed concern over people dying during manual scavenging in India, and stated that nowhere in the world people are sent to "gas chambers to die".

Reported by: Akriti Tyagi
Follow: Google News Icon
  • share
null | Image: self
Advertisement

A three-judge bench consisting of Justices Arun Mishra, MR Shah, and BR Gavai in Supreme Court on September 18 expressed serious concern over people dying during manual scavenging and sew cleaning in India, and stated that where in world people are sent to "gas chambers to die". apex court me se hard-hitting observations at time of hearing Centre's plea seeking review of its last year's verdict which h virtually diluted provisions of arrest under SC/ST Act.

RE I SC refers to 3-judge bench to seek review of SC/ST Act judgement

Advertisement

SC on Caste Discrimination

While making scathing observations, apex court said that though more than 70 years have passed since Independence, caste discrimination still persists in country. A bench heed by Justice Arun Mishra questioned Attorney General KK Venugopal, appearing for Centre, as to why proper protective gear like mask and oxygen cylinders were t being provided to people who are engd in manual scavenging and cleaning of sew or manholes.

"Why are you t providing m masks and oxygen cylinders? In country in world, people are sent to gas chambers to die. Four to five people are dying due to this every month."

RE I Supreme Court pushes for framing UCC, cites Goa as 'Shining example'

Advertisement

Dilution of provision under SC/ST Act

Supreme Court has reserved its orders to  Centre's petition seeking review of its March 20, 2018, judgment which h virtually diluted provisions of arrest under SC/ST Act. Last year, Supreme Court h introduced safeguards to prevent misuse of SC/ST Act. It h held that prior sanction of appointing authority is required for prosecuting officers for acts done by m with respect to SC/ST Act in ir official capacity.

Giving a purposive interpretation to Section 18 of SC/ST Act, court h stated, "re is absolute bar against grant of anticipatory bail in cases under Atrocities Act if prima facie case is me out or where on judicial scrutiny complaint is found to be prima facie mala fide."

RE I  stay in SC/ST Act order, says Supreme Court. Full details here

Advertisement

This h led to Centre filing a review petition against judgment and h subsequently brought about an amendment seeking to invalidate judgment in 2018. amendment itself was subsequently challenged in Supreme Court. bench will hear challenge next week against 2018 amendment brought to SC/ST Act.

RE I Supreme Court journs hearing on restrictions in J&K to September 16

Advertisement

RE I Supreme Court agrees to hear plea against Triple Talaq criminalisation

(With inputs from PTI)

Advertisement

16:36 IST, September 18th 2019