Pak Woman Gets Rejected From Job Interview, Claims 'Scammer' AI Detector Flagged Her Original Work

Viral News: As use of AI is on rise, employers are using 'AI detectors' in recruitment process. 

A recent LinkedIn post by a Pakistani woman, Damisha Irfan has gained massive attention on social media.

writer shared her experience of getting rejected in a job interview as her original work was flagged as AI content by detectors.

“Got Rejected Because of ‘So-Called’ AI Detectors. Yes, you re that right! I was rejected from a job interview simply because my work was flagged by an unreliable AI detector" she wrote.

“After putting my genuine effort into creating original content, it was dismissed due to se 'scammer' AI tools that can’t accurately distinguish between real human creativity and AI-generated text,” Irfan ded.
She questioned fairness of process, ting that despite her efforts in creating original content, her work was dismissed

She concluded her post by writing “It's time to reconsider how we use se tools in decision-making. Let’s t let invation turn into a roblock for auntic creators.”

How Did Netizens React? 

Her post has sparked a debate on role of Artificial intelligence in examining original content.

A user wrote reacting to post “I think it’s right time to stop working as a content writer and let digital business tycoons use artificial intelligence for content generation and business promotion. I don’t think Google will allow m to use AI-generated content for marketing purposes.”

''That is s to hear, sorry. This is unfortunate challenge we’re all facing as creators. Almost 99% of se AI detectors will flag even original content as AI-generated. most disappointing part is that those in charge rarely take a moment to re through content mselves to determine if it truly sounds AI-generated or human-written. This raises pressing question: How can content writers get justice against wrongful accusations by unreliable AI detectors?” a second user wrote.

A third person remarked "It is really s that we are depending on tools too much for checking quality of content. Grammarly and reability tools have replaced proofreing.”