Supporters of Imran Khan Attack Bushra Bibi’s Ex-Husband at Islamabad High Court

Islamab: In a dramatic and violent turn of events, supporters of Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party attacked Khawar Manika, ex-husband of former First Ly Bushra Bibi, within premises of Islamab High Court. incident unfolded as Manika entered court for a hearing expected to deliver a critical verdict in Iddat case, a legal battle that has captivated national attention.

Background of Case

Iddat case revolves around marriage of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. According to Islamic law, Iddat is a period a woman must observe after death of her spouse or after a divorce, during which she may not marry anor man. case questions wher Bushra Bibi hered to this period before marrying Imran Khan. implications of case are significant, as both Khan and Bibi are currently serving a seven-year term due to alleged violations related to ir marriage. This controversial case has intensified political and social tensions, especially among PTI supporters and ir opponents.

Incident

As Khawar Manika entered Islamab High Court, he was met with hostility from a group of PTI supporters who h gared outside court. Eyewitnesses reported that crowd, visibly agitated and aggressive, began shouting abusive remarks at Manika. situation quickly escalated when some supporters physically attacked him, slapping him and throwing bottles, causing chaos within court premises. Manika’s legal team, present during attack, attempted to shield him but struggled to contain frenzied crowd.

Eyewitness Accounts

One eyewitness, Ayesha Malik, a lawyer present at scene, described chaos: "It was a horrifying scene. PTI supporters were shouting slogans and hurling abuses at Khawar Manika. When he tried to enter court, y surrounded him, and before we knew it, y were hitting him and throwing bottles. It was complete mayhem, and security personnel were overwhelmed."

Security Lapses

attack has raised serious questions about security arrangements at Islamab High Court. Despite high-profile nature of case and obvious tensions, security measures appeared inequate to handle aggressive crowd. Legal experts and court officials have expressed concern over breach, calling for a thorough investigation into lapses that allowed such an incident to occur within court’s premises.

Political Repercussions

assault on Khawar Manika underscores heightened political stakes surrounding Iddat case. PTI supporters view case as a politically motivated attack on ir leer, Imran Khan, who has maintained a significant following despite legal and political challenges. incident is likely to inflame alrey high tensions between PTI supporters and ir opponents, potentially leing to furr unrest.

Political analyst Dr. Fah Hussain commented on situation: "This incident is a clear indication of volatile political climate in Pakistan. Iddat case is not just a legal matter but a deeply political one, and emotions are running high on both sides. attack on Manika reflects desperation and frustration among PTI supporters who see ir leer being targeted unfairly."

Legal Implications

Iddat case's verdict, expected later today, holds significant legal implications for Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. If court rules against m, it could le to furr legal challenges and possibly ditional penalties. Conversely, a ruling in ir favour could bolster PTI's narrative of victimization and persecution.

Legal expert Barrister Ali Zafar explained: " Iddat case is pivotal not only for Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi but also for broer legal and political landscape in Pakistan. A ruling against m would reaffirm allegations of impropriety in ir marriage, while a ruling in ir favor would be a significant victory for PTI and could potentially vindicate ir claims of political victimisation."

Public Reaction

public reaction to attack has been mixed. PTI supporters have defended ir actions, arguing that Khawar Manika’s role in case has been provocative and that he deserved backlash. On social media, many PTI followers expressed support for attackers, while ors condemned violence and called for restraint.

Conversely, critics of PTI have denounced attack as a blatant act of lawlessness and a dangerous precedent. Human rights organizations have also weighed in, condemning violence and urging government to ensure safety and security of all individuals involved in legal proceedings